| 1888 Articles Home | Finance Articles | Insurance Articles | Insurance RSS | ![]() |
||
Is the proposal in Michigan realistic? |
||||
|
The article reports on the proposal to go to a vote in Michigan in 2010 to cut car insurance premiums by 20%. If approved, insurance underwriting will be significantly less profitable. |
||||||||||||
| Author: Grace Oaks |
|
|||||||||||
So if a state has taken on major new commitments at a time when its tax revenues are falling, it is interesting to see it also championing new provisions that might help families struggling to make ends meet at the expense of the profits of the insurance industry. This is carrying the idea of redistribution somewhat further than Barack Obama intended during his presidential campaign. He was only talking about using taxes on rich individuals to reduce the wealth gap. This is more bold. Going back to the beginning, everyone with a vehicle on the road will tell you their insurance premiums have been rising during the recession. The Consumer Price Index may have been falling, but many now see the cost of insurance as one of the biggest headaches when it comes to the family budget. So, this November sees the state election panel accepting a ballot proposal for 2010 to cut car insurance rates by a flat 20% and to protect the consumer against a range of unfair practices. If the backers can collect 300,000 signatures, the proposal will appear on the ballot next year. Should a sufficient number of voter support the proposal, the law would be changed. In theory, it will stimulate competition between the insurance companies licensed to sell policies into Michigan and advance the interests of consumers by encouraging affordable policies for everyone.
Needless to say, the insurance industry is shocked and awed by this proposal, insisting such a change in the law would force them out of business. To many experts, this claim seems somewhat exaggerated. The insurance industry declared hundreds of millions of dollars in profit during 2008 and paid good dividends to their stockholders. Just one company, State Farm, declared profits of $5 billion. So the notion they would all become insolvent overnight is less than convincing. Voters in Michigan will say whether this change is the law is desirable. If the vote is affirmative, the legislature will move to cut industry profits. One indicator to watch will be the car insurance quotes. If these keep on rising leading up to the vote, the people may be encouraged to promote their own interests. But if the industry moderates its pricing policies up to the vote. . . Well, let's just say the politics will be interesting.
About Author
See what Grace Oaks has written on other topics by visiting http://www.carinsuranceguidance.com/is-the-proposal-in-michigan-realistic.html, the site where he has frequent contributions and open discussions. Grace Oaks has a vast experience in the domain and will give you a better idea of it.
Article Source:
http://www.1888articles.com/author-grace-oaks-24697.html
Other Related Articles What is this antitrust status? by Norris Rios How often should you pay for your insurance? by Norris Rios Paying for your policy by Grace Oaks Is the proposal in Michigan realistic? by Grace Oaks The choice between HMOs and PPOs explained by Grace Oaks Which is better: term or permanent insurance? by Grace Oaks Helpful tips on buying cars: new and used by Grace Oaks |

