| 1888 Articles Home | Finance Articles | Insurance Articles | Insurance RSS | ![]() |
||
Gender equality and premium rates |
||||
|
The article comments on the new European Court decision forcing insurers to ignore gender when calculating premium rates. |
||||||||||||
| Author: David Mayer |
|
|||||||||||
Actuaries are paid to estimate the risk of accidents and, as they keep telling us, the statistics never lie. These actuaries are like pack rats. They collect every last detail of every accident that gets reported. It doesn't matter whether it's a police report, a claim to the insurers from a hospital for treating accident victims, or reports in local newspapers. They have information about accidents going back to the time we were switching over from real horses to horse-powered engines.
So ask how many men aged 33 have had an accident at 2 a.m. while driving a red Ford Contour in the rain with a new moon and, with the click of a mouse, you will have the answer by return. It's the detail that's so impressive. More importantly it shows exactly how many claims are made by male as opposed to female drivers, and what the average value of the claims is.
All around the world, the statistical evidence shows women making fewer claims and, when they are involved in accidents, the amount claimed tends to be lower. The reason for this is that, in general, women drive within the law. They do not try to beat the lights or drive too fast on city streets so, if there is an accident, they are traveling more slowly and the impact is less damaging both to the vehicles and the people inside. Not surprisingly, this excellent safety record has been rewarded by lower premiums. Where the risk is lower, drivers pay less. Except, in Europe, this will change next year.
The European Court for Human Rights has just ruled that men and women must pay the same premiums. At the end of 2012, there must be a new system in place to calculate premiums without relying on gender as a key factor. So what's going on? Well, ask yourself, is it fair to charge someone more to insure their vehicle just because they are male. No one asks to be born male or female so why penalize all those who have the bad luck to be born male? Keeping this real, men don't crash because their sexual apparatus gets caught in the steering wheel.
People get into accidents because they drive badly. There's no point in forcing people to pay more because of something they are powerless to control. There's every reason to base auto insurance quotes on actual driving records because, if the record is bad and the premium rate is high, it gives those drivers an incentive to improve their driving.
Calculating premiums should be very personal, looking at how well each individual drives. Grouping everyone together on the basis of their gender for issuing auto insurance quotes is arbitrary and unfair (at least, in Europe).
About Author
David Mayer has shared his vision and professional opinion on a vast array of topics and http://www.insurpolicies.net/articles/gender-equality.html is one of the sites where you can read more of David Mayer's contributions.
Article Source:
http://www.1888articles.com/author-david-mayer-16158.html
Other Related Articles More fraud means higher rates by Norris Rios Increasing the liability minimum coverage by Norris Rios No pay, no play explained by Norris Rios Gender equality and premium rates by David Mayer Armed Services Workers Save on Insurance by David Mayer 10 Tips for Affordable Teenage Insurance by David Mayer Fraud levels rising by David Mayer |

